Remove leading slashes from captured portions of paths when
redirecting using splats. This makes a directive like
"/articles/* /posts/:splat 302" behave as described in
FEATURES.md, i.e. "/articles/foo" now redirects to
"/posts/foo" rather than to "/posts//foo". Fixes#269.
This also changes the behavior of a redirect like
"/articles/* /posts:splat 302". "/articles/foo" will now
redirect to "/postsfoo" rather than to "/posts/foo".
This change also fixes an issue where paths like
"/articles123" would be incorrectly matched by the above
patterns.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/308
Reviewed-by: crapStone <codeberg@crapstone.dev>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Erat <dan@erat.org>
Co-committed-by: Daniel Erat <dan@erat.org>
This would yield to the error "forge client failed" instead of e.g. "404 Not Found". The issue was introduced in cbb2ce6d07.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/306
Reviewed-by: crapStone <codeberg@crapstone.dev>
Co-authored-by: Moritz Marquardt <momar@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Moritz Marquardt <momar@noreply.codeberg.org>
Move repetitive code from Options.matchRedirects into a new
Redirect.rewriteURL method and add a new test file.
No functional changes are intended; this is in preparation
for a later change to address #269.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/304
Reviewed-by: crapStone <codeberg@crapstone.dev>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Erat <dan@erat.org>
Co-committed-by: Daniel Erat <dan@erat.org>
This PR add the `$NO_DNS_01` option (disabled by default) that removes the DNS ACME provider, and replaces the wildcard certificate by individual certificates obtained using the TLS ACME provider.
This option allows an instance to work without having to manage access tokens for the DNS provider. On the flip side, this means that a certificate can be requested for each subdomains. To limit the risk of DOS, the existence of the user/org corresponding to a subdomain is checked before requesting a cert, however, this limitation is not enough for an forge with a high number of users/orgs.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/290
Reviewed-by: Moritz Marquardt <momar@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Marie 'Histausse' Mineau <histausse@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Jean-Marie 'Histausse' Mineau <histausse@protonmail.com>
Just a small grammar change in the README.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/297
Reviewed-by: crapStone <codeberg@crapstone.dev>
Co-authored-by: caelandb <bothacaelan@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: caelandb <bothacaelan@gmail.com>
Hello 👋
since it affected my deployment of the pages server I started to look into the problem of the blank pages and think I found a solution for it:
1. There is no check if the file response is empty, neither in cache retrieval nor in writing of a cache. Also the provided method for checking for empty responses had a bug.
2. I identified the redirect response to be the issue here. There is a cache write with the full cache key (e. g. rawContent/user/repo|branch|route/index.html) happening in the handling of the redirect response. But the written body here is empty. In the triggered request from the redirect response the server then finds a cache item to the key and serves the empty body. A quick fix is the check for empty file responses mentioned in 1.
3. The decision to redirect the user comes quite far down in the upstream function. Before that happens a lot of stuff that may not be important since after the redirect response comes a new request anyway. Also, I suspect that this causes the caching problem because there is a request to the forge server and its error handling with some recursions happening before. I propose to move two of the redirects before "Preparing"
4. The recursion in the upstream function makes it difficult to understand what is actually happening. I added some more logging to have an easier time with that.
5. I changed the default behaviour to append a trailing slash to the path to true. In my tested scenarios it happened anyway. This way there is no recursion happening before the redirect.
I am not developing in go frequently and rarely contribute to open source -> so feedback of all kind is appreciated
closes#164
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/292
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: crapStone <codeberg@crapstone.dev>
Co-authored-by: Hoernschen <julian.hoernschemeyer@mailbox.org>
Co-committed-by: Hoernschen <julian.hoernschemeyer@mailbox.org>
A database bug in xorm.go prevents the pages-server from saving a
renewed certificate for a domain that already has one in the database.
Co-authored-by: crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/209
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
I forgot to update the name of this function in the CI log so it looks like it's running the same test twice even though it's not.
Co-authored-by: crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/210
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Currently if the canonical domain validations fails(either for
legitimate reasons or for bug reasons like the request to Gitea/Forgejo
failing) it will use main domain certificate, which in the case for
custom domains will warrant a security error as the certificate isn't
issued to the custom domain.
- This patch handles this situation more gracefully and instead only
disallow obtaining a certificate if the domain validation fails, so in
the case that a certificate still exists it can still be used even if
the canonical domain validation fails. There's a small side effect,
legitimate users that remove domains from `.domain` will still be able
to use the removed domain(as long as the DNS records exists) as long as
the certificate currently hold by pages-server isn't expired.
- Given the increased usage in custom domains that are resulting in
errors, I think it ways more than the side effect.
- In order to future-proof against future slowdowns of instances, add a retry mechanism to the domain validation function, such that it's more likely to succeed even if the instance is not responding.
- Refactor the code a bit and add some comments.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/160
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Currently any error generated by requesting the `.domains` file of a repository would be logged under the info log level, which isn't the correct log level when we exclude the not found error.
- Use warn log level if the error isn't the not found error.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/162
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Added new TockenBucket named `acmeClientFailLimit` to avoid being banned because of the [Failed validation limit](https://letsencrypt.org/docs/failed-validation-limit/) of Let's Encrypt.
The behaviour is similar to the other limiters blocking the `obtainCert` func ensuring rate under limit.
Co-authored-by: fsologureng <sologuren@estudiohum.cl>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/151
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Felipe Leopoldo Sologuren Gutiérrez <fsologureng@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Felipe Leopoldo Sologuren Gutiérrez <fsologureng@noreply.codeberg.org>
- It's not guaranteed that `tls.X509KeyPair` will set `c.Leaf`.
- This patch fixes this by using a wrapper that parses the leaf
certificate(in bytes) if `c.Leaf` wasn't set.
- Resolves#149
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/150
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Daniel Erat