This change hoists opacity out of props and changes it to a number
instead of an enum.
The change to a number is to make tldraw more flexible for library
consumers who might want more expressivity with opacity than our 5
possible values allow. the tldraw editor will now happily respect any
opacity between 0 and 1. The limit to our supported values is enforced
only in the UI. I think this is limited enough that it's a reasonable
tradeoff between in-app simplicity and giving external developers the
flexibility they need.
There's a new `opacityForNextShape` property on the instance. This works
exactly the same way as propsForNextShape does, except... it's just for
opacity. With this, there should be no user-facing changes to how
opacity works in tldraw. There are also new `opacity`/`setOpacity` APIs
in the editor that work with it/selections similar to how props do.
@ds300 do you mind reviewing the migrations here?
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking Change
### Test Plan
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] Webdriver tests
### Release Notes
[internal only for now]
This PR cleans up the file names and imports for @tldraw/tlschema.
It also:
- renames some erroneously named validators / migrators (e.g.
`pageTypeValidator` -> `pageValidator`)
- removes the duplicated `languages.ts` and makes `tlschema` the source
of truth for languages
- renames ID to RecordId
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking Change
### Release Notes
- [editor] Remove `app.createShapeId`
- [tlschema] Cleans up exports
As part of my highlighter work, I've been writing a few test cases
around rendering with different combinations of nested frames and
groups. Writing these test cases using `createShapes` is really hard,
and reading them is even harder. I wanted to see if there was an easier
way for us to define shapes for test cases, and turns out... there is!
This diff introduces a JSX-based DSL for defining test cases. It looks
something like this:
```tsx
// create some shapes
const ids = app.createShapesFromJsx([
<TL.geo ref="A" x={100} y={100} w={100} h={100} />,
<TL.frame ref="B" x={200} y={200} w={300} h={300}>
<TL.geo ref="C" x={200} y={200} w={50} h={50} />
<TL.text ref="D" x={1000} y={1000} text="Hello, world!" align="end" />
</TL.frame>,
])
// refer to shape IDs according to their `ref`
app.select(ids.C)
```
It's probably not worth trying to migrate everything possible to this,
but i picked a few random tests to convert over to show how it works
(and because i wanted this diff to end up red overall)
In the future, I'd like to use this with visual regression testing to
test rendering/exports on some complex combinations of shapes too.
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any testing-related code only (will not
publish a new version)
### Release Notes
[internal only change]
alex