This reverts commit b6716a3750.
Not sure why, but this introduced a `/// <references />` comment in the
tldraw/tldraw api-report.md file that doesn't show up when you build
from brivate. Reverting for now.
### Change Type
- [x] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
### Test Plan
-
### Release Notes
-
Removes `propsForNextShape` and replaces it with the new styles API.
Changes in here:
- New custom style example
- `setProp` is now `setStyle` and takes a `StyleProp` instead of a
string
- `Editor.props` and `Editor.opacity` are now `Editor.sharedStyles` and
`Editor.sharedOpacity`
- They return an object that flags mixed vs shared types instead of
using null to signal mixed types
- `Editor.styles` returns a `SharedStyleMap` - keyed on `StyleProp`
instead of `string`
- `StateNode.shapeType` is now the shape util rather than just a string.
This lets us pull the styles from the shape type directly.
- `color` is no longer a core part of the editor set on the shape
parent. Individual child shapes have to use color directly.
- `propsForNextShape` is now `stylesForNextShape`
- `InstanceRecordType` is created at runtime in the same way
`ShapeRecordType` is. This is so it can pull style validators out of
shape defs for `stylesForNextShape`
- Shape type are now defined by their props rather than having separate
validators & type defs
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
1. Big time regression testing around styles!
2. Check UI works as intended for all shape/style/tool combos
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
-
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This diff reverts 09c36781 and tweaks how some of our linting was
working.
I'm not actually sure what caused the regression that 09c36781 was
fixing - it was something to do with typescript being used to transpile
eslintrc.js, but that being excluded from the tsconfig for those
projects. I fixed that by removing `rootDir` from those, but that
revealed some other issues with files not getting ignored correctly.
I fixed the ignoring issue with a change I've wanted to make to these
scripts for a while: only running them on files that are actually
tracked by git, instead of on everything with a relevant extension. A
side effect of that is that we have to re-implement .eslintignore
support ourselves, but that's very straight forward: the `ignore`
package that eslint uses is very easy to include.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package (will not publish a new version)
### Test Plan
-
### Release Notes
[internal-only]
Steve Ruiz