From e4d76640b8d8a2da2f70cb71ced20c7acd40c88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: miguel <31931809+miguelvaca@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:49:53 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] Place a gap between Observations and Change History

---
 toroid.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/toroid.html b/toroid.html
index 1086e7e..8daf3b9 100644
--- a/toroid.html
+++ b/toroid.html
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
             Inductance and reactance values correspond well with those predicted by online calculators such as toroids.info.
             However, predictions for Q have mixed results when compared to the Micrometals Q-Curve Catalog found <a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/micrometals-production/filer_public/7e/d0/7ed096a0-fe6e-4df1-9da9-e129c1ee73d2/q_curve_catalog_issue_h.pdf">HERE</a>.
             I suggest using their catalog for accurate Q prediction. It has been previously identified that Q values predicted using Micrometal's curve-fit equations do not reconcile with measured Q as discussed <a href="https://owenduffy.net/calc/toroid.htm">here</a>.
-            <br>
+            <br><br>
             <b><u>Change history:</u></b><br>
             <b>[6-Nov-21]</b> <br>
             * Re-enabled PI support.<br>