Store the masked chip_id in the stlink structure. Should fix unexpected

behaviour with L1 and F2
pull/49/head
Uwe Bonnes 2012-01-19 13:55:00 +01:00
rodzic 9c41193a16
commit 16756fbe05
1 zmienionych plików z 5 dodań i 5 usunięć

Wyświetl plik

@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ int stlink_load_device_params(stlink_t *sl) {
chip_id = 0x413;
}
sl->chip_id = chip_id;
sl->chip_id = chip_id & 0xfff;
for(size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(devices) / sizeof(devices[0]); i++) {
if(devices[i].chip_id == (chip_id & 0xFFF)) {
if(devices[i].chip_id == sl->chip_id) {
params = &devices[i];
break;
}
@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ int stlink_load_device_params(stlink_t *sl) {
sl->sram_base = STM32_SRAM_BASE;
// read flash size from hardware, if possible...
if ((chip_id & 0xFFF) == STM32_CHIPID_F2) {
if (sl->chip_id == STM32_CHIPID_F2) {
sl->flash_size = 0; // FIXME - need to work this out some other way, just set to max possible?
} else if ((chip_id & 0xFFF) == STM32_CHIPID_F4) {
} else if (sl->chip_id == STM32_CHIPID_F4) {
sl->flash_size = 0x100000; //todo: RM0090 error; size register same address as unique ID
} else {
uint32_t flash_size = stlink_read_debug32(sl, params->flash_size_reg) & 0xffff;
@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ int stlink_fcheck_flash(stlink_t *sl, const char* path, stm32_addr_t addr) {
*/
int stlink_verify_write_flash(stlink_t *sl, stm32_addr_t address, uint8_t *data, unsigned length) {
size_t off;
if ((sl->chip_id & 0xFFF) == STM32_CHIPID_F4) {
if (sl->chip_id == STM32_CHIPID_F4) {
DLOG("(FIXME)Skipping verification for F4, not enough ram (yet)\n");
return 0;
}