sane-project-website/old-archive/2001-05/0230.html

152 wiersze
6.0 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>sane-devel: Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scann</TITLE>
<META NAME="Author" CONTENT="Geoff Ghose (geoff@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu)">
<META NAME="Subject" CONTENT="Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000">
<H1>Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning</H1>
<!-- received="Fri May 18 09:41:04 2001" -->
<!-- isoreceived="20010518164104" -->
<!-- sent="Fri, 18 May 2001 11:38:00 -0500" -->
<!-- isosent="20010518163800" -->
<!-- name="Geoff Ghose" -->
<!-- email="geoff@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning" -->
<!-- id="3B054FE8.60408@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu" -->
<!-- inreplyto="20010518111140.D16107@gerf.org" -->
<STRONG>From:</STRONG> Geoff Ghose (<A HREF="mailto:geoff@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu?Subject=Re:%20Recommend%20a%20USB%20scanner%20with%20Transparency%20Scanning&In-Reply-To=&lt;3B054FE8.60408@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu&gt;"><EM>geoff@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu</EM></A>)<BR>
<STRONG>Date:</STRONG> Fri May 18 2001 - 09:38:00 PDT
<P>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0231.html">lee johnson: "Re: canon"</A>
<UL>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0229.html">Ulrich Deiters: "Re: canon"</A>
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0228.html">The Doctor What: "Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0233.html">The Doctor What: "Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<LI><STRONG>Reply:</STRONG> <A HREF="0233.html">The Doctor What: "Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#230">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#230">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#230">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#230">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<HR NOSHADE><P>
<!-- body="start" -->
<P>
The Doctor What wrote:
<BR>
<P><EM>&gt; Hi!
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I was hoping someone could recommend a good scanner for me.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; Background:
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I have a UMAX Astra 610 or 620 scsi. It's okay, but getting this
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; thing to work with my Adaptech 2940UW is next to impossible (I've
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; done it before, but it's always a pain). That is, I can't even get
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; my system to boot reliably, forget loading linux. In the past, it
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; locked up my system often under Linux, less ofter under Win9x.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; So I thought I'd get a USB scanner, since USB seems to be working
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; well under Linux.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I'm looking for one that I can do transparency scanning with, as I
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; am rather sick of having my carefully adjusted photos (I tend to
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; take 3 or 5 of them, each with different f-stops, etc) all color
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; corrected into mediocraty.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I'm not looking to print photos with my scans (yet), so I don't
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; really need 2400dpi scanning, but more is better.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I have $200 I can spend on the scanner, but I may (or may not) go
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; higher.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; I was looking at the Epson Perfection 1240U photo and 1640SU photo
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; based on the Epson sane driver page page.
</EM><BR>
<P><P>I have a 1240U photo, but your not going to find it for $200. I think mine was about $300
<BR>
with the transparency adapter. I think it's a very good scanner for its price.
<BR>
<P>It works very with Linux, after I made a timeout patch described on the sane driver page.
<BR>
Definitely plug and play.
<BR>
<P>I often scan 35 mm negative film, and I think the results are good but not outstanding. I
<BR>
use a resolution of 1800 dpi, but anything above 1200 is accomplished with interpolation
<BR>
and therefore might want to be avoided. At these settings you have &quot;mega-pixel&quot; resolution.
<BR>
The shortcoming is the optical density, although it's not bad (3.0 I think), a larger
<BR>
dynamic range would really help. For scanning slides, it is even more critical. (I've only
<BR>
scanned negatives).
<BR>
<P>I believe the 1640U has a higher optical density but I don't have direct experience with it.
<BR>
<P><P><P><P><P><PRE>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <A HREF="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</A>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <A HREF="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20Recommend%20a%20USB%20scanner%20with%20Transparency%20Scanning&In-Reply-To=&lt;3B054FE8.60408@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu&gt;">majordomo@mostang.com</A>
</PRE>
<P><!-- body="end" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0231.html">lee johnson: "Re: canon"</A>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0229.html">Ulrich Deiters: "Re: canon"</A>
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0228.html">The Doctor What: "Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0233.html">The Doctor What: "Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<LI><STRONG>Reply:</STRONG> <A HREF="0233.html">The Doctor What: "Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#230">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#230">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#230">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#230">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<!-- trailer="footer" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<P>
<SMALL>
<EM>
This archive was generated by <A HREF="http://www.hypermail.org/">hypermail 2b29</A>
: <EM>Fri May 18 2001 - 09:43:01 PDT</EM>
</EM>
</SMALL>
</BODY>
</HTML>