sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-02/0083.html

65 wiersze
3.0 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Fri Feb 13 05:11:45 1998 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:50:46 +0100 (MET)" -->
<!-- name="becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de" -->
<!-- email="becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Mustek 1200SP" -->
<!-- id="m0y3KZr-0000WoC@charon.beck-sw.de" -->
<!-- inreplyto="199802130435.UAA05436@panda.mostang.com" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Mustek 1200SP</title>
<h1>Re: Mustek 1200SP</h1>
<a href="mailto:becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de"><i>becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de</i></a><br>
<i>Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:50:46 +0100 (MET)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#83">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#83">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#83">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#83">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0084.html">Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: [PARPORT] Scanner - Primax PagePartner"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0082.html">Hans Christian Saustrup: "RE: Mustek 1200SP - eprom rip?"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0077.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Mustek 1200SP"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
<i>&gt; becka&gt; Isn't there a third option about "alternate-correction" or</i><br>
<i>&gt; becka&gt; something ? I.e. turning on the FW 1.00 correction method ?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; The 1.00 correction is autodetected. The particulars are:</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; /* Revision 1.00 of the MFS-12000SP firmware is buggy and needs</i><br>
<i>&gt; this workaround. Maybe others need it too, but this one is</i><br>
<i>&gt; for sure. We know for certain that revision 1.02 or newer</i><br>
<i>&gt; has this bug fixed. */</i><br>
<i>&gt; if (fw_revision &lt; 0x102)</i><br>
<i>&gt; dev-&gt;flags |= MUSTEK_FLAG_LD_MFS;</i><br>
<i>&gt; else</i><br>
<i>&gt; dev-&gt;flags |= MUSTEK_FLAG_LD_NONE;</i><br>
<p>
Could you make this an option ? At best defaulting to autodetect but<br>
allowing to set/unset it in the mustek.conf ?<br>
<p>
I have heard of 1.02 and up scanners working at least better with the<br>
1.00 correction ... ouch ... someone should shoot the responsible person <br>
at Mustek ...<br>
<p>
CU,Andy<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
= Andreas Beck | Email : &lt;<a href="mailto:andreas.beck@ggi-project.org">andreas.beck@ggi-project.org</a>&gt; =
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0084.html">Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: [PARPORT] Scanner - Primax PagePartner"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0082.html">Hans Christian Saustrup: "RE: Mustek 1200SP - eprom rip?"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0077.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Mustek 1200SP"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>