sane-project-website/old-archive/2000-05/0112.html

130 wiersze
5.6 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>sane-devel: Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image</TITLE>
<META NAME="Author" CONTENT="Bill Wohler (wohler@newt.com)">
<META NAME="Subject" CONTENT="Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000">
<H1>Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?</H1>
<!-- received="Wed May 17 23:50:17 2000" -->
<!-- isoreceived="20000518065017" -->
<!-- sent="15 May 2000 15:44:18 -0700" -->
<!-- isosent="20000515224418" -->
<!-- name="Bill Wohler" -->
<!-- email="wohler@newt.com" -->
<!-- subject="Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?" -->
<!-- id="80k8gve8n1.fsf@gbr.newt.com" -->
<!-- inreplyto="Fri, 12 May 2000 16:39:48 -0700&quot;" -->
<STRONG>From:</STRONG> Bill Wohler (<A HREF="mailto:wohler@newt.com?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;80k8gve8n1.fsf@gbr.newt.com&gt;"><EM>wohler@newt.com</EM></A>)<BR>
<STRONG>Date:</STRONG> Mon May 15 2000 - 15:44:18 PDT
<P>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Collins, Martin: "Good A3 scanner?"</A>
<UL>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0111.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax 1220S + Transparency adapter + XSANE"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0142.html">pixel fairy: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#112">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#112">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#112">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#112">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<HR NOSHADE><P>
<!-- body="start" -->
<P>
&nbsp;&nbsp;Thanks for all the feedback, although I have to admit I'm a bit
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;overwhelmed.
<BR>
<P>Jan Steinman &lt;<A HREF="mailto:Jan@Bytesmiths.com?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;80k8gve8n1.fsf@gbr.newt.com&gt;">Jan@Bytesmiths.com</A>&gt; writes:
<BR>
<EM>&gt; If you don't need to ever share files with Mac users, use whatever
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; the Microsoft metafile format is.
</EM><BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;No chance. I do not consider proprietary, de-facto &quot;standards&quot; to be
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;standard, *especially* if they were written by Microsoft. Give me
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;something that has been written by the IETF or some other standards
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;body. Think interoperability.
<BR>
<P><EM>&gt; However, if there's the slightest chance you'll be feeding this file
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; to a graphics professional -- service bureau, stock photo house, ad
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; agency, etc., use TIFF because those places will more likely than not
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; be using Macs.
</EM><BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;Thanks, that was the most useful bit of information I heard.
<BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;Basically, I'm scanning a bunch of slides and burning CDs. I'll be
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;(later) processing the scans with the GIMP and other software on
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;Linux. I'm making copies of the CDs for a friend who probably uses
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;Photoshop on Windows, and someday I may wish to give the images to a
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;graphics professional.
<BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;I may be using the term &quot;raw&quot; incorrectly--I just mean that that the
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;images have not gone through any laborious post-processing after
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;scanning. I am using an auto-adjust button and tweaking the contrast
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;in Xsane which performs the scans though.
<BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;OK, so I should use TIFF. Now, on to compression.
<BR>
<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;Xsane, via libtiff I'd imagine, provides several compression
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;schemes: JPEG DCT, and something called &quot;pack bits&quot;. Is the JPEG DCT
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;compression LZT in sheep's clothing or is this something I could use
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;that would be universally accepted?
<BR>
<P><PRE>
--
Bill Wohler &lt;<A HREF="mailto:wohler@newt.com?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;80k8gve8n1.fsf@gbr.newt.com&gt;">wohler@newt.com</A>&gt;
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
<P>--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <A HREF="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</A>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <A HREF="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;80k8gve8n1.fsf@gbr.newt.com&gt;">majordomo@mostang.com</A>
</PRE>
<P><!-- body="end" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Collins, Martin: "Good A3 scanner?"</A>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0111.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax 1220S + Transparency adapter + XSANE"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0142.html">pixel fairy: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#112">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#112">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#112">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#112">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<!-- trailer="footer" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<P>
<SMALL>
<EM>
This archive was generated by <A HREF="http://www.hypermail.org/">hypermail 2b29</A>
: <EM>Wed May 17 2000 - 23:50:25 PDT</EM>
</EM>
</SMALL>
</BODY>
</HTML>