sane-project-website/old-archive/2000-05/0089.html

148 wiersze
5.8 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>sane-devel: Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image</TITLE>
<META NAME="Author" CONTENT="Steve Underwood (steveu@coppice.org)">
<META NAME="Subject" CONTENT="Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000">
<H1>Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?</H1>
<!-- received="Sat May 13 05:11:26 2000" -->
<!-- isoreceived="20000513121126" -->
<!-- sent="Sat, 13 May 2000 20:14:35 +0800" -->
<!-- isosent="20000513121435" -->
<!-- name="Steve Underwood" -->
<!-- email="steveu@coppice.org" -->
<!-- subject="Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?" -->
<!-- id="391D472B.FF2FDDAE@coppice.org" -->
<!-- inreplyto="20000512200416.7017.qmail@web1404.mail.yahoo.com" -->
<STRONG>From:</STRONG> Steve Underwood (<A HREF="mailto:steveu@coppice.org?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;391D472B.FF2FDDAE@coppice.org&gt;"><EM>steveu@coppice.org</EM></A>)<BR>
<STRONG>Date:</STRONG> Sat May 13 2000 - 05:14:35 PDT
<P>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0090.html">Stephen Williams: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<UL>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0088.html">John Witford: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0086.html">pixel fairy: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0088.html">John Witford: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#89">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#89">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#89">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#89">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<HR NOSHADE><P>
<!-- body="start" -->
<P>
pixel fairy wrote:
<BR>
<P><EM>&gt; &gt; the format to be
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; &gt; portable so that it can be used by all software.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; &gt; Are there other
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; &gt; considerations that I have neglected?
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; tiff can save arbritary information in &quot;tags&quot; which
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; sometimes other programs cant read, for example a tiff
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; saved in photoshop has a pair that gimp cant read. but
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; this can save information like an ICC profile or gamma
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; information. png is probably the smallest portable
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; format, but the only thing it saves besides pixel data
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; is gamma. another advantage of tiff is the ability to
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; store more than one image in a file. an image viewer
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; can use this to read/write thumbnails and the like.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; gif is also a bad choice because of its limited color
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; depth (256 color pallet). if you want to avoid
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; proprietary nastiness make sure you dont save tiffs
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; with LZW compression. PNM is simply the easiest format
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; to read/write and probably the most portable since
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; images can be stored in plain text.
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt;
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; overall, tif is the most flexible and should probably
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; be your default, with png for when you need smaller
</EM><BR>
<EM>&gt; file sizes.
</EM><BR>
<P>I don't think you really describe the full horror of TIFF incompatibility.
<BR>
Colour TIFF isn't as bad as the black and white form used for FAXes, but
<BR>
neither is great. Two graphics programs or FAX packages hardly ever read
<BR>
each other's files perfectly. LIBTIFF has quite poor tolerance to files
<BR>
that don't exactly fit the TIFF spec. - it usually core dumps. Its good at
<BR>
producing the right thing, though. Take care storing more than one image in
<BR>
a TIFF file, too. There are still a number of programs that cannot cope
<BR>
with that, particularly for FAX TIFF's where you might think multi-page
<BR>
files were most useful.
<BR>
<P>I've nothing against the TIFF spec., although its a bit tag heavy. The
<BR>
problem is the majority of implementations suck big time.
<BR>
<P>Steve
<BR>
<P><P><P><PRE>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <A HREF="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</A>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <A HREF="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20&quot;Standard&quot;%20or%20&quot;best&quot;%20image%20format?&In-Reply-To=&lt;391D472B.FF2FDDAE@coppice.org&gt;">majordomo@mostang.com</A>
</PRE>
<P><!-- body="end" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<!-- next="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0090.html">Stephen Williams: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0088.html">John Witford: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0086.html">pixel fairy: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0088.html">John Witford: "Re: &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;best&quot; image format?"</A>
<!-- reply="end" -->
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
<A HREF="date.html#89">[ date ]</A>
<A HREF="index.html#89">[ thread ]</A>
<A HREF="subject.html#89">[ subject ]</A>
<A HREF="author.html#89">[ author ]</A>
</UL>
<!-- trailer="footer" -->
<HR NOSHADE>
<P>
<SMALL>
<EM>
This archive was generated by <A HREF="http://www.hypermail.org/">hypermail 2b29</A>
: <EM>Sat May 13 2000 - 05:11:59 PDT</EM>
</EM>
</SMALL>
</BODY>
</HTML>