sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-10/0122.html

60 wiersze
2.9 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Sun Oct 17 06:11:38 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Sun, 17 Oct 1999 10:19:25 -0200" -->
<!-- name="Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes" -->
<!-- email="mendes@mgconecta.com.br" -->
<!-- subject="Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="" -->
<title>sane-devel: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?</title>
<h1>Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?</h1>
<b>Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes</b> (<a href="mailto:mendes@mgconecta.com.br"><i>mendes@mgconecta.com.br</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sun, 17 Oct 1999 10:19:25 -0200</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#122">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#122">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#122">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#122">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0123.html">David Nelson: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0121.html">Wim Taymans: "Re: Wrong colors with Scanmaker X6"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0125.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Reply:</b> <a href="0125.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Hello<br>
I have been struggling to get my old UMax T-630 to work with sane<br>
for almost six months. I decided<br>
to start from scratch again just to see if I can find the missing<br>
point. As usual there is a very simple<br>
question that is getting in the way:<br>
Why my scanner works fine and fast with Adobe Photoshop<br>
3.05-VistaScan 2.30 on Windows 98? When<br>
I switch to caldera 2.3-sane-1.0.1 is a completely different story: i)<br>
the scanner scans with tiny steps<br>
(so tiny that I can go for lunch and the thingy is still going) and ii)<br>
crashes with error messages at the<br>
end of the whole scanning process (that is, no image). What is going on?<br>
<p>
Thanks for your help.<br>
<p>
Ed<br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0123.html">David Nelson: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0121.html">Wim Taymans: "Re: Wrong colors with Scanmaker X6"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0125.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Reply:</b> <a href="0125.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>