sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-04/0349.html

61 wiersze
3.0 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Sat Apr 24 14:42:04 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Sat, 24 Apr 1999 14:26:34 -0700" -->
<!-- name="Brian Macy" -->
<!-- email="bmacy@sunshinecomputing.com" -->
<!-- subject="Re: WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0</title>
<h1>Re: WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0</h1>
<b>Brian Macy</b> (<a href="mailto:bmacy@sunshinecomputing.com"><i>bmacy@sunshinecomputing.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sat, 24 Apr 1999 14:26:34 -0700</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#349">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#349">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#349">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#349">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0350.html">Bob van der Poel: "Re: lineart vrs greyscale"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0348.html">Nick Lamb: "Re: WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
<i>&gt; I have done test scans with WinSANE 0.0.0.0, haven't tried 0.0.1.0 yet but</i><br>
<i>&gt; I expect the same results. With a test backend, where I can choose the</i><br>
<i>&gt; default and precise behaviour, I can get a good scan. With a real scanner</i><br>
<i>&gt; as you noted, the default tends to be LineArt, which won't work in this</i><br>
<i>&gt; package yet. I think the developer of 0.0.1.0 is probably many months from</i><br>
<i>&gt; having a working package, which is a shame.</i><br>
<p>
Actually... if someone sends me the format of the data for line art scans<br>
I'll add it rather quickly... otherwise I'll have to sit down and take a<br>
look at it. Once I get a couple of solid days work I'll have get/set<br>
parameters working so this won't be as big of an issue... but that could be<br>
a while. I wish people would have given me the feedback about lineart... I<br>
would have supported it for the 0.0.1.0 release. My Microtek scanner<br>
defaults to 24bit scans.<br>
<p>
Which as far as the name goes... I started the project many months ago but<br>
stopped when the TWAIN DLL was announce to be available shortly. When I<br>
found that the DLL didn't work for me and that the source for it wasn't<br>
going to be released I started again. I don't really care about the name but<br>
I think the initial TWAIN DLL project is pretty much dead... my current<br>
scanning application will eventually turn into a TWAIN DLL.<br>
<p>
Brian Macy<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0350.html">Bob van der Poel: "Re: lineart vrs greyscale"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0348.html">Nick Lamb: "Re: WinSANE0.9 and WinSANE 0.0.1.0"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>