kopia lustrzana https://gitlab.com/sane-project/website
85 wiersze
3.6 KiB
HTML
85 wiersze
3.6 KiB
HTML
<!-- received="Sat Sep 26 07:41:18 1998 PDT" -->
|
||
<!-- sent="Sat, 26 Sep 1998 16:39:37 +0200" -->
|
||
<!-- name="Bernd Schroeder" -->
|
||
<!-- email="bernd@aquila.muc.de" -->
|
||
<!-- subject="Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??" -->
|
||
<!-- id="" -->
|
||
<!-- inreplyto="Pine.SV4.3.96.980924001050.9744A-100000@school.cs.indiana.edu" -->
|
||
<title>sane-devel: Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??</title>
|
||
<h1>Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??</h1>
|
||
<b>Bernd Schroeder</b> (<a href="mailto:bernd@aquila.muc.de"><i>bernd@aquila.muc.de</i></a>)<br>
|
||
<i>Sat, 26 Sep 1998 16:39:37 +0200</i>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#180">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#180">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#180">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#180">[ author ]</a>
|
||
<!-- next="start" -->
|
||
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0181.html">David B. Rees: "Re: FW: Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
|
||
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0179.html">Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
|
||
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
||
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<!-- body="start" -->
|
||
Hi,<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
On Thu, Sep 24, 1998 at 12:14:27AM -0500, Brian E. Bothwell wrote:<br>
|
||
<i>> On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Bernd Schroeder wrote:</i><br>
|
||
<i>> </i><br>
|
||
<i>> </i><br>
|
||
<i>> > > Oops! I sent the debug info without SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK2=128. Looks like</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > > I may have answered my own question given the line "Model 0x98 not</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > > supported"... :(</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > </i><br>
|
||
<i>> > This means that the backend doesn't yet know this model, but it doesn't</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > mean that the backend does not work with it or can be made to work with</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > it.</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > </i><br>
|
||
<i>> Sh trnsf func equ: 1</i><br>
|
||
<i>> Buffer type: Ring</i><br>
|
||
<i>> FEPROM: No</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [microtek2] scsi_read_system_status: md=0x80b1448, fd=-1</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [microtek2] dump_area2: readsystemstatus</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [readsystemstatus]</i><br>
|
||
<i>> 28008100000000000900</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [microtek2] dump_area2: readsystemstatusresult</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [readsystemstatusresult]</i><br>
|
||
<i>> 030000001100000000</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [microtek2] scsi_test_unit_ready: md=/dev/sgd</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [microtek2] dump_area2: testunitready</i><br>
|
||
<i>> [testunitready]</i><br>
|
||
<i>> 000000000000</i><br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
this model should work with the backend.<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
But it is very strange, that the application hangs at a "test unit ready".<br>
|
||
This is perhaps the most simple SCSI command at all and should at least<br>
|
||
return anything (eventually 'busy'). The above commands are model<br>
|
||
independent.<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Does it always hang at this command ?<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Can you check, what happens, if you remove the scsi_test_uni_ready() <br>
|
||
call in microtek2.c (it is called in one place) ?<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Bernd<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<pre>
|
||
--
|
||
Bernd Schroeder
|
||
Email: <a href="mailto:bernd@aquila.muc.de">mailto:bernd@aquila.muc.de</a>
|
||
PGP public key available: <a href="mailto:pgp@aquila.muc.de">mailto:pgp@aquila.muc.de</a> | Subject: send key
|
||
<p>
|
||
<pre>
|
||
--
|
||
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
|
||
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
|
||
</pre>
|
||
<!-- body="end" -->
|
||
<p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<!-- next="start" -->
|
||
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0181.html">David B. Rees: "Re: FW: Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
|
||
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0179.html">Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
|
||
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
||
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
||
</ul>
|