Re: Porting SANE backends

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Georg Huettenegger: "Re: horizontal stripes in your image"
• Previous message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: CVS Branch fails to compile with egcs"
• Maybe in reply to: Svend Daugaard Pedersen: "Porting SANE backends"
• Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Porting SANE backends"

> It's correct that amiga has a multi-tasking system (and the access
> to the SCSI port is in fact always done in a separate task), but
> 'fork' is not an ANSI C routine and it is not easy to implement on
> C systems not having it.
>
> The fact is that I have given up porting some of the backends because
> of this 'fork'. As you can see from my comments, I know that there are
> good reasons for using it. What I'm asking for is that it is used in
> a way that makes it possible to remove (in the snapscan backend there
> is code for the case that fork fails).
>

How do you start a new task on the amiga?

Bye
Oliver

--
EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch




--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Georg Huettenegger: "Re: horizontal stripes in your image"
 Previous message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: CVS Branch fails to compile with egcs"
 Maybe in reply to: Svend Daugaard Pedersen: "Porting SANE backends"

 Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Porting SANE backends"