diff --git a/unsupported/microtek-artixscan-2020.html b/unsupported/microtek-artixscan-2020.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..95034b94 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/microtek-artixscan-2020.html @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + + +
++
+USB +
+0x5da +
+0x202e +
+m012 +
++ Believe the chipset in this scanner is m012 but not totally certain... + If so then it's a toshiba chip and is simliar to the microteck scanmaker 8700 +
++<device descriptor of 0x05da/0x202e at 002:012> +bLength 18 +bDescriptorType 1 +bcdUSB 2.00 +bDeviceClass 255 +bDeviceSubClass 3 +bDeviceProtocol 0 +bMaxPacketSize0 64 +idVendor 0x05DA +idProduct 0x202E +bcdDevice 0.00 +iManufacturer 0 () +iProduct 0 () +iSerialNumber 0 () +bNumConfigurations 1 + <configuration 0> + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 2 + wTotalLength 32 + bNumInterfaces 1 + bConfigurationValue 1 + iConfiguration 0 () + bmAttributes 192 (Self-powered) + MaxPower 0 mA + <interface 0> + <altsetting 0> + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 4 + bInterfaceNumber 0 + bAlternateSetting 0 + bNumEndpoints 2 + bInterfaceClass 0 + bInterfaceSubClass 0 + bInterfaceProtocol 0 + iInterface 0 () + <endpoint 0> + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 64 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + <endpoint 1> + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 64 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + +<trying to find out which USB chip is used> + checking for GT-6801 ... + this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for GT-6816 ... + this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GT-8911 ... + this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for MA-1017 ... + this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for MA-1015 ... + this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for MA-1509 ... + this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... + this is not a LM983x (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL646 ... + this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL646_HP ... + this is not a GL646_HP (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL660+GL646 ... + this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceSubClass = 0x3) + checking for GL841 ... + this is not a GL841 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for ICM532B ... + this is not a ICM532B (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for PV8630/LM9830 ... + this is not a PV8630/LM9830 (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for M011 ... + this is not a M011 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for RTS8822L-01H ... + this is not a RTS8822L-01H (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for rts8858c ... + this is not a rts8858c (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for SQ113 ... + this is not a SQ113 (bDeviceClass = 255) + +<Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip (result from sane-backends 1.0.18)> ++ +
+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +
++ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +
+ ++ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +
+ +
+ SANE homepage
+ Contact
+
+ $Date$ $Author$ +
+ + +