diff --git a/unsupported/canon-lide-50.html b/unsupported/canon-lide-50.html index f338fa9e..dabde1c0 100644 --- a/unsupported/canon-lide-50.html +++ b/unsupported/canon-lide-50.html @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ other chips:

Comments

+

+ This scanner may be supported by the Genesys + backend, when it's finished. +

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

 T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#=  4 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
diff --git a/unsupported/canon-lide-80.html b/unsupported/canon-lide-80.html
index 587b471d..df2555bd 100644
--- a/unsupported/canon-lide-80.html
+++ b/unsupported/canon-lide-80.html
@@ -31,9 +31,14 @@
     

Chipset

- Probably Genesys Logic GL841. + Genesys Logic GL841.

Comments

+

+ This scanner may be supported by the Genesys + backend, when it's finished. +

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

 T: Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2300c.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2300c.html
index 515bcf5b..31cb81a5 100644
--- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2300c.html
+++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2300c.html
@@ -31,11 +31,17 @@
     

Chipset

+ GL646_HP
On the chip these are the no's: fzc1n20gj and m11b41a

Comments

- Someone Genesys + backend, when it's finished. +

+

+ Someone elsewants to write a backend.

diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2400c.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2400c.html index 83dee5bf..bfee902f 100644 --- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2400c.html +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-2400c.html @@ -31,11 +31,17 @@

Chipset

+ Maybe GL646_HP

Comments

+

+ If this is the GL646 chip, maybe the Genesys + backend can be used, when it's finished? +

Someone + href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2003-October/009104.html">Someone else also wants to write a backend.

diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3670c.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3670c.html index cf83783e..735f52e9 100644 --- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3670c.html +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3670c.html @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ 0x1405

Chipset

+

+ Probably GL646_HP +

Written on the chipset:

@@ -46,6 +49,11 @@ M1B416256A DZC1HF2GJ

Comments

+

+ If this is the GL646 chip, maybe the Genesys + backend can be used, when it's finished? +

Same scanner as 3690?

diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3690.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3690.html index 63d2c75a..33f19735 100644 --- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3690.html +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-3690.html @@ -23,12 +23,16 @@

Vendor ID

- + 0x03f0

Product ID

+ 0x1405

Chipset

+

+ Probably GL646_HP +

 26-00204-00A
 0314FGKC9-10
@@ -36,6 +40,11 @@
 EliteMT 100Mhz
     

Comments

+

+ If this is the GL646 chip, maybe the Genesys + backend can be used, when it's finished? +

Same scanner as 3670c?

diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-8290.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-8290.html index 7a55960f..7d015cd4 100644 --- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-8290.html +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-8290.html @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@

Comments

+ Includes ADF and TA. Similar to 8200C?

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

diff --git a/unsupported/lexmark-x1150.html b/unsupported/lexmark-x1150.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b768aa87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/unsupported/lexmark-x1150.html
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+
+
+
+  
+    Scanner information
+    
+    
+    
+    
+     
+    
+  
+
+      
+    

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Lexmark X1150 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ Vendor=043d +

+

Product ID

+

+ ProdID=007c +

+

Chipset

+

+ Realtek RTS8852B +

+
+Board Number  BJ4150M02001  Ver A-7
+2 large processors :
+Realtek RTS8852B-03  37012Q1  327F      - PC-Based MFP Controller Chip ( close relative to .)
+Lexmark 18K0205      330B31V  ARM       - Printer controller?
+
+3 smaller ICs:
+SN105082 37AC4LT  14D0205               Silicon Controlled Rectifier
+BD6775   329      H91                   NPN Darlington Transistor
+24C01W6  B326L                          Serial EEPROM
+
+

Comments

+

+ All in one job. Printer works fine with the z600 driver. Info on the + scanner chip (well the closes relative I can find) can be found here. +

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

+
+T:  Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=06 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  7 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
+D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
+P:  Vendor=043d ProdID=007c Rev= 1.00
+S:  Manufacturer=Lexmark
+S:  Product=X1100 Series
+S:  SerialNumber=5003470
+C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=  0mA
+I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff Driver=(none)
+E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=   8 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=250ms
+
+
+<device descriptor of 0x043d/0x007c at 002:004>
+bLength               18
+bDescriptorType       1
+bcdUSB                1.10
+bDeviceClass          0
+bDeviceSubClass       0
+bDeviceProtocol       0
+bMaxPacketSize0       8
+idVendor              0x043D
+idProduct             0x007C
+bcdDevice             1.00
+iManufacturer         1 ((null))
+iProduct              2 ((null))
+iSerialNumber         7 ((null))
+bNumConfigurations    1
+ <configuration 0>
+ bLength              9
+ bDescriptorType      2
+ wTotalLength         39
+ bNumInterfaces       1
+ bConfigurationValue  1
+ iConfiguration       6 ((null))
+ bmAttributes         224 (Self-poweredRemote Wakeup)
+ MaxPower             0 mA
+  <interface 0>
+   <altsetting 0>
+   bLength            9
+   bDescriptorType    4
+   bInterfaceNumber   0
+   bAlternateSetting  0
+   bNumEndpoints      3
+   bInterfaceClass    255
+   bInterfaceSubClass 0
+   bInterfaceProtocol 255
+   iInterface         9 ((null))
+    <endpoint 0>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x81 (in 0x01)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    64
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    <endpoint 1>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x02 (out 0x02)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    8
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    <endpoint 2>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x83 (in 0x03)
+    bmAttributes      3 (interrupt)
+    wMaxPacketSize    1
+    bInterval         250 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+
+<trying to find out which USB chip is used>
+    checking for GT-6801 ...
+    this is not a GT-6801 (bDeviceClass = 0)
+    checking for GT-6816 ...
+    this is not a GT-6816 (bNumEndpoints = 3)
+    checking for MA-1017 ...
+    this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1015 ...
+    this is not a MA-1015 (bDeviceClass = 0)
+    checking for MA-1509 ...
+    this is not a MA-1509 (bDeviceClass = 0)
+    checking for LM983[1,2,3] ...
+    this is not a LM983x (bEndpointAddress = 0x81, bmAttributes = 0x2, wMaxPacketSize = 0x40, bInterval = 0x0)
+    checking for GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL660+GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+<Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip>
+
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x043d, product=0x007c) at libusb:002:004
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/medion-MD5345.html b/unsupported/medion-MD5345.html index ac993691..137144e0 100644 --- a/unsupported/medion-MD5345.html +++ b/unsupported/medion-MD5345.html @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ Tevion MD 6228
Medion MD 5345
Tevion MD 5345
- Medion MD 6471 + Medion MD 6471
+ Primax Slim-Line 1200

Bus type