diff --git a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html index e8c61e49..0f009ef9 100644 --- a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html +++ b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@
The Vantas and Xerox scanners seem to be clones of the Visioneer scanner - (or vice versa). + (or vice versa). However, there also seems to exist another variant of the + Xerox scanner ("Xerox 4800 One Touch") which has product id 0x03a0.
Looks similar to OneTouch 5800 diff --git a/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html b/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..87fb6e93 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +
++ Xerox 4800 One Touch +
++ USB +
++ 0x04a7 +
++ 0x03a0 +
++
++ There is also a "Xerox One Touch 4800" which has a different product + id. Looking at the picture, looks a lot like Visioneer + OneTouch 9000 USB. +
+++ ++bLength 18 +bDescriptorType 1 +bcdUSB 2.00 +bDeviceClass 255 +bDeviceSubClass 255 +bDeviceProtocol 255 +bMaxPacketSize0 64 +idVendor 0x04A7 +idProduct 0x03A0 +bcdDevice 2.01 +iManufacturer 1 (Visioneer) +iProduct 3 (USB Scanner) +iSerialNumber 0 () +bNumConfigurations 1 + + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 2 + wTotalLength 39 + bNumInterfaces 1 + bConfigurationValue 1 + iConfiguration 0 () + bmAttributes 192 (Self-powered) + MaxPower 10 mA + + + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 4 + bInterfaceNumber 0 + bAlternateSetting 0 + bNumEndpoints 3 + bInterfaceClass 255 + bInterfaceSubClass 255 + bInterfaceProtocol 255 + iInterface 0 () + + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 512 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 512 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x83 (in 0x03) + bmAttributes 3 (interrupt) + wMaxPacketSize 1 + bInterval 8 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + + + checking for GT-6801 ... + this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for GT-6816 ... + this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) + checking for GT-8911 ... + this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) + checking for MA-1017 ... + this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) + checking for MA-1015 ... + this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for MA-1509 ... + this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... + this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for GL646 ... + this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) + checking for GL646_HP ... + this is not a GL646_HP (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for GL660+GL646 ... + this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) + checking for GL841 ... + this is not a GL841 (reg 0x38 != 0x15) + checking for ICM532B ... + this is not a ICM532B (check 2, bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for PV8630/LM9830 ... + this is not a PV8630/LM9830 (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for M011 ... + this is not a M011 (bcdUSB = 0x200) + checking for RTS8822L-01H ... + this is not a RTS8822L-01H (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for rts8858c ... + this is not a rts8858c (bDeviceClass = 255) + checking for SQ113 ... + this is not a SQ113 (bDeviceClass = 255) + + +found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a7 [Visioneer], product=0x03a0 [USB Scanner]) at libusb:001:004 + +T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#= 4 Spd=480 MxCh= 0 +D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 +P: Vendor=04a7 ProdID=03a0 Rev= 2.01 +S: Manufacturer=Visioneer +S: Product=USB Scanner +C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 10mA +I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none) +E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms +E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms +E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=16ms +
+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +
++ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +
+ ++ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +
+ +
+ SANE homepage
+ Contact
+
+ $Date$ $Author$ +
+ + +