diff --git a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html index e8c61e49..0f009ef9 100644 --- a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html +++ b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@

Comments

The Vantas and Xerox scanners seem to be clones of the Visioneer scanner - (or vice versa). + (or vice versa). However, there also seems to exist another variant of the + Xerox scanner ("Xerox 4800 One Touch") which has product id 0x03a0.

Looks similar to OneTouch 5800 diff --git a/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html b/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..87fb6e93 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/xerox-4800-onetouch.html @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Xerox 4800 One Touch +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x04a7 +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x03a0 +

+

Chipset

+

+

+

Comments

+

+ There is also a "Xerox One Touch 4800" which has a different product + id. Looking at the picture, looks a lot like Visioneer + OneTouch 9000 USB. +

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+
+bLength               18
+bDescriptorType       1
+bcdUSB                2.00
+bDeviceClass          255
+bDeviceSubClass       255
+bDeviceProtocol       255
+bMaxPacketSize0       64
+idVendor              0x04A7
+idProduct             0x03A0
+bcdDevice             2.01
+iManufacturer         1 (Visioneer)
+iProduct              3 (USB Scanner)
+iSerialNumber         0 ()
+bNumConfigurations    1
+ 
+ bLength              9
+ bDescriptorType      2
+ wTotalLength         39
+ bNumInterfaces       1
+ bConfigurationValue  1
+ iConfiguration       0 ()
+ bmAttributes         192 (Self-powered)
+ MaxPower             10 mA
+  
+   
+   bLength            9
+   bDescriptorType    4
+   bInterfaceNumber   0
+   bAlternateSetting  0
+   bNumEndpoints      3
+   bInterfaceClass    255
+   bInterfaceSubClass 255
+   bInterfaceProtocol 255
+   iInterface         0 ()
+    
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x81 (in 0x01)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    512
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x02 (out 0x02)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    512
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x83 (in 0x03)
+    bmAttributes      3 (interrupt)
+    wMaxPacketSize    1
+    bInterval         8 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+
+
+    checking for GT-6801 ...
+    this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GT-6816 ...
+    this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GT-8911 ...
+    this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1017 ...
+    this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1015 ...
+    this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for MA-1509 ...
+    this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for LM983[1,2,3] ...
+    this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL646_HP ...
+    this is not a GL646_HP (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GL660+GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL841 ...
+    this is not a GL841 (reg 0x38 != 0x15)
+    checking for ICM532B ...
+    this is not a ICM532B (check 2, bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for PV8630/LM9830 ...
+    this is not a PV8630/LM9830 (bDeviceClass = 255)
+    checking for M011 ...
+    this is not a M011 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for RTS8822L-01H ...
+    this is not a RTS8822L-01H (bDeviceClass = 255)
+    checking for rts8858c ...
+    this is not a rts8858c (bDeviceClass = 255)
+    checking for SQ113 ...
+    this is not a SQ113 (bDeviceClass = 255)
+
+
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a7 [Visioneer], product=0x03a0 [USB Scanner]) at libusb:001:004
+
+T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
+D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
+P:  Vendor=04a7 ProdID=03a0 Rev= 2.01
+S:  Manufacturer=Visioneer
+S:  Product=USB Scanner
+C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 10mA
+I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
+E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=16ms
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + +