From 289daa1e9cd90e85a40adbfdf4d54f2151f9430c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Henning Geinitz Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:37:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added and updated several scanners. --- unsupported/hp-scanjet-4070.html | 92 ++++++++ unsupported/hp-scanjet-5590.html | 198 ++++++++++++++++++ unsupported/lexmark-x5250.html | 110 ++++++++++ unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-6100.html | 104 +++++++++ .../minolta-dimage-scan-multi-pro.html | 92 ++++++++ unsupported/plustek-opticpro-st12.html | 108 +++++++++- unsupported/primax-colorado-usb-9600.html | 118 +++++++++++ unsupported/tevion-md90009.html | 8 +- unsupported/trust-combiscan-19200.html | 23 +- unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html | 92 ++++++++ unsupported/visioneer-onetouch6600.html | 96 +++++++++ unsupported/xerox-2400-onetouch.html | 27 ++- 12 files changed, 1056 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 unsupported/hp-scanjet-5590.html create mode 100644 unsupported/lexmark-x5250.html create mode 100644 unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-6100.html create mode 100644 unsupported/minolta-dimage-scan-multi-pro.html create mode 100644 unsupported/primax-colorado-usb-9600.html create mode 100644 unsupported/visioneer-onetouch6600.html diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4070.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4070.html index a1fb9bb4..d1cae692 100644 --- a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4070.html +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4070.html @@ -50,6 +50,98 @@ I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff Driver=(none) E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=256ms + +<device descriptor of 0x03f0/0x2405 at 001:003 (hewlett packard hp scanjet)> +bLength 18 +bDescriptorType 1 +bcdUSB 2.00 +bDeviceClass 0 +bDeviceSubClass 0 +bDeviceProtocol 0 +bMaxPacketSize0 64 +idVendor 0x03F0 +idProduct 0x2405 +bcdDevice 1.00 +iManufacturer 1 (hewlett packard) +iProduct 2 (hp scanjet) +iSerialNumber 3 (CN49VALCJFRW) +bNumConfigurations 1 +<configuration 0> +bLength 9 +bDescriptorType 2 +wTotalLength 39 +bNumInterfaces 1 +bConfigurationValue 1 +iConfiguration 4 (USB SCANNER) +bmAttributes 224 (Self-poweredRemote Wakeup) +MaxPower 2 mA +<interface 0> +<altsetting 0> +bLength 9 +bDescriptorType 4 +bInterfaceNumber 0 +bAlternateSetting 0 +bNumEndpoints 3 +bInterfaceClass 255 +bInterfaceSubClass 0 +bInterfaceProtocol 255 +iInterface 5 (Bulk-In, Bulk-Out, Interrupt Interface) +<endpoint 0> +bLength 7 +bDescriptorType 5 +bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) +bmAttributes 2 (bulk) +wMaxPacketSize 512 +bInterval 0 ms +bRefresh 0 +bSynchAddress 0 +<endpoint 1> +bLength 7 +bDescriptorType 5 +bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) +bmAttributes 2 (bulk) +wMaxPacketSize 512 +bInterval 0 ms +bRefresh 0 +bSynchAddress 0 +<endpoint 2> +bLength 7 +bDescriptorType 5 +bEndpointAddress 0x83 (in 0x03) +bmAttributes 3 (interrupt) +wMaxPacketSize 1 +bInterval 12 ms +bRefresh 0 +bSynchAddress 0 + +<trying to find out which USB chip is used> +checking for GT-6801 ... +this is not a GT-6801 (bDeviceClass = 0) +checking for GT-6816 ... +this is not a GT-6816 (bcdUSB = 0x200) +checking for GT-8911 ... +this is not a GT-8911 (check 2, bcdUSB = 0x200) +checking for MA-1017 ... +this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +checking for MA-1015 ... +this is not a MA-1015 (bDeviceClass = 0) +checking for MA-1509 ... +this is not a MA-1509 (bDeviceClass = 0) +checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... +this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200) +checking for GL646 ... +this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +checking for GL646_HP ... +this is not a GL646_HP (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +checking for GL660+GL646 ... +this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +checking for GL841 ... +this is not a GL841 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +checking for ICM532B ... +this is not a ICM532B (check 1, bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 255) +<Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip> + +found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [hewlett packard], product=0x2405 [hp scanjet]) at libusb:001:003

Want to add or correct information?

diff --git a/unsupported/hp-scanjet-5590.html b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-5590.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..44e3334b --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/hp-scanjet-5590.html @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Hewlett Packard ScanJet 5590 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x03f0 +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x1705 +

+

Chipset

+

+

+

Comments

+

+

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+T:  Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=05 Cnt=01 Dev#= 10 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
+D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
+P:  Vendor=03f0 ProdID=1705 Rev= 3.05
+S:  Manufacturer=Hewlett-Packard
+S:  Product=hp scanjet scanner
+S:  SerialNumber=CN44HT604C
+C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 10mA
+I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
+E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=16ms
+
+<device descriptor of 0x03f0/0x1705 at 003:010 (Hewlett-Packard hp scanjet scann
+er)>
+bLength               18
+bDescriptorType       1
+bcdUSB                2.00
+bDeviceClass          255
+bDeviceSubClass       255
+bDeviceProtocol       255
+bMaxPacketSize0       64
+idVendor              0x03F0
+idProduct             0x1705
+bcdDevice             3.05
+iManufacturer         1 (Hewlett-Packard)
+iProduct              2 (hp scanjet scanner)
+iSerialNumber         12 (CN44HT604C)
+bNumConfigurations    1
+ <configuration 0>
+ bLength              9
+ bDescriptorType      2
+ wTotalLength         39
+ bNumInterfaces       1
+ bConfigurationValue  1
+ iConfiguration       0 ()
+ bmAttributes         192 (Self-powered)
+ MaxPower             10 mA
+  <interface 0>
+   <altsetting 0>
+   bLength            9
+   bDescriptorType    4
+   bInterfaceNumber   0
+   bAlternateSetting  0
+   bNumEndpoints      3
+   bInterfaceClass    255
+   bInterfaceSubClass 255
+   bInterfaceProtocol 255
+   iInterface         0 ()
+    <endpoint 0>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x81 (in 0x01)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    512
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    <endpoint 1>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x02 (out 0x02)
+    bmAttributes      2 (bulk)
+    wMaxPacketSize    512
+    bInterval         0 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+    <endpoint 2>
+    bLength           7
+    bDescriptorType   5
+    bEndpointAddress  0x83 (in 0x03)
+    bmAttributes      3 (interrupt)
+    wMaxPacketSize    1
+    bInterval         8 ms
+    bRefresh          0
+    bSynchAddress     0
+
+<trying to find out which USB chip is used>
+    checking for GT-6801 ...
+    this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GT-6816 ...
+    this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GT-8911 ...
+    this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1017 ...
+    this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1015 ...
+    this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for MA-1509 ...
+    this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for LM983[1,2,3] ...
+    this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL646_HP ...
+    this is not a GL646_HP (bcdUSB = 0x200)
+    checking for GL660+GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL841 ...
+    this is not a GL841 (reg 0x38 != 0x15)
+    checking for ICM532B ...
+    this is not a ICM532B (check 2, bcdUSB = 0x200)
+<Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip>
+
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x1705 [hp scanjet scanner]) at libusb:003:010
+
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/lexmark-x5250.html b/unsupported/lexmark-x5250.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..356b2669 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/lexmark-x5250.html @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Lexmark X5250 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x043D +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x0093 +

+

Chipset

+

+

+

Comments

+

+

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
+D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
+P:  Vendor=043d ProdID=0093 Rev= 0.01
+S:  Manufacturer=Lexmark
+S:  Product=Lexmark 5200 Series
+S:  SerialNumber=21D0185113002MM
+C:* #Ifs= 3 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 16mA
+I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 4 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
+E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=87(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=07(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+I:  If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=07(print) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=usblp
+E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
+I:  If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=usbhid
+E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   8 Ivl=100ms
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-6100.html b/unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-6100.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d599a759 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/microtek-scanmaker-6100.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Microtek ScanMaker 6100 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x05da +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x30E5 +

+

Chipset

+

+

+

Comments

+

+

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+T:  Bus=04 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=  3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
+D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
+P:  Vendor=05da ProdID=30e5 Rev= 1.00
+S:  Manufacturer=Prolific Technology Inc.
+S:  Product=USB Scanner
+C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=100mA
+I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
+E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
+E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=500us
+
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/minolta-dimage-scan-multi-pro.html b/unsupported/minolta-dimage-scan-multi-pro.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6b77e092 --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/minolta-dimage-scan-multi-pro.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro +

+

Bus type

+

+ IEEE-1394 +

+

Vendor ID

+

+

+

Product ID

+

+

+

Chipset

+

+

+

Comments

+

+ 35mm to 6x9cm film scanner. +

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/plustek-opticpro-st12.html b/unsupported/plustek-opticpro-st12.html index c2578f44..01aab657 100644 --- a/unsupported/plustek-opticpro-st12.html +++ b/unsupported/plustek-opticpro-st12.html @@ -28,19 +28,22 @@

Product ID

- 0x040b + 0x040b / 0x0600

Chipset

- GT6816. + GT6816 (0x040b) / GL646 (0x0600).

Comments

- It was previously mentioned that this scanner uses a GL646, but this seems - to be wrong. So it may be supported by the gt68xx backend in future. + It was previously mentioned that this scanner (product id 0x040b) uses a GL646, but this seems + to be wrong. So it may be supported by the gt68xx backend in + future. However, there are newer reports that the product id is is 0x0600 + and that this model uses a gl646. Strange. Please send more reports!

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

+Product id 0x040b:
 <device descriptor of 0x07b3/0x040b at 002:003 (600DPI USB Scanner)>
 bLength               18
 bDescriptorType       1
@@ -101,7 +104,102 @@ bNumConfigurations 
     checking for GT-6816 ...
 <This USB chip looks like a GT-6816>
 
-found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3, product=0x040b [600DPI USB Scanner], chip=GT-6816) at libusb:002:003
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3, product=0x040b [600DPI USB Scanner],
+chip=GT-6816) at libusb:002:003
+
+Product id 0x0600:
+T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 
+D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 
+P: Vendor=07b3 ProdID=0600 Rev= 0.00 
+S: Manufacturer=PLUSTEK INC 
+S: Product=USB SCANNER 
+C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr= 48mA 
+I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=10(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=00 Driver=(none) 
+E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms 
+E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms 
+E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=8ms
+
+device descriptor of 0x07b3/0x0600 at 003:003 (PLUSTEK INC USB SCANNER)> 
+bLength 18 
+bDescriptorType 1 
+bcdUSB 1.10 
+bDeviceClass 0 
+bDeviceSubClass 0 
+bDeviceProtocol 0 
+bMaxPacketSize0 8 
+idVendor 0x07B3 
+idProduct 0x0600 
+bcdDevice 0.00 
+iManufacturer 10 (PLUSTEK INC) 
+iProduct 11 (USB SCANNER) 
+iSerialNumber 0 () 
+bNumConfigurations 1 
+<configuration 0> 
+bLength 9 
+bDescriptorType 2 
+wTotalLength 39 
+bNumInterfaces 1 
+bConfigurationValue 1 
+iConfiguration 0 () 
+bmAttributes 224 (Self-poweredRemote Wakeup) 
+MaxPower 48 mA 
+<interface 0> 
+<altsetting 0> 
+bLength 9 
+bDescriptorType 4 
+bInterfaceNumber 0 
+bAlternateSetting 0 
+bNumEndpoints 3 
+bInterfaceClass 16 
+bInterfaceSubClass 1 
+bInterfaceProtocol 0 
+iInterface 0 () 
+<endpoint 0> 
+bLength 7 
+bDescriptorType 5 
+bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) 
+bmAttributes 2 (bulk) 
+wMaxPacketSize 64 
+bInterval 0 ms 
+bRefresh 0 
+bSynchAddress 0 
+<endpoint 1> 
+bLength 7 
+bDescriptorType 5 
+bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) 
+bmAttributes 2 (bulk) 
+wMaxPacketSize 64 
+bInterval 0 ms 
+bRefresh 0 
+bSynchAddress 0 
+<endpoint 2> 
+bLength 7 
+bDescriptorType 5 
+bEndpointAddress 0x83 (in 0x03) 
+bmAttributes 3 (interrupt) 
+wMaxPacketSize 1 
+bInterval 8 ms 
+bRefresh 0 
+bSynchAddress 0 
+
+<trying to find out which USB chip is used> 
+checking for GT-6801 ... 
+this is not a GT-6801 (bDeviceClass = 0) 
+checking for GT-6816 ... 
+this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 16) 
+checking for MA-1017 ... 
+this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 16) 
+checking for MA-1015 ... 
+this is not a MA-1015 (bDeviceClass = 0) 
+checking for MA-1509 ... 
+this is not a MA-1509 (bDeviceClass = 0) 
+checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... 
+this is not a LM983x (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 16) 
+checking for GL646 ... 
+<This USB chip looks like a GL646> 
+
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3 [PLUSTEK INC], product=0x0600 [USB SCANNER], chip=GL646) at libusb:003:003
+
     

Want to add or correct information?

diff --git a/unsupported/primax-colorado-usb-9600.html b/unsupported/primax-colorado-usb-9600.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b5ce258d --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/primax-colorado-usb-9600.html @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Primax Colorade USB 9600 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x0461 +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x0340 +

+

Chipset

+
+
+------------ IC1 ----------------------------- +EICI 0910oo (oo this is small number zero 00) +F98380285 +----------------------------------------------- +------------------------- IC11 ---------------- +WM 8143-12C +86AD4ET4C +---------------------------------------------- +--------------------------- IC8 --------------- +ScanLogic SL11 982628PLCC-1.1 A003 Taiwan +----------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------- +On electric bord describes: +EPCB0J400A-1 + +and decribes +ASYM104250-A +Y42MV83400 +---------------------------------------------- +

+ It seems the EICI 091000 is the scanner chip interface par. port. The + scanlogic SL11 (now Cypress) is the par. port to usb converter bridge. For + info EICI 091000 see also here. + +

+

Comments

+

+

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/tevion-md90009.html b/unsupported/tevion-md90009.html index b82d4d8f..fc89bd9b 100644 --- a/unsupported/tevion-md90009.html +++ b/unsupported/tevion-md90009.html @@ -31,11 +31,15 @@

Chipset

- Perhaps PL-2555 or PL-2551? + Perhaps PL-2555 or + PL-2551?

Comments

- Available since 2005-03-09 in German Aldi supermarkets. + Same vendor/product ids as Microtek + Scanmaker 6000. Available since 2005-03-09 in German Aldi supermarkets.

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

diff --git a/unsupported/trust-combiscan-19200.html b/unsupported/trust-combiscan-19200.html
index 9b1b2901..407a62ad 100644
--- a/unsupported/trust-combiscan-19200.html
+++ b/unsupported/trust-combiscan-19200.html
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
       Trust CombiScan 19200
Boeder Sm@rtScan Office
Avigramm Minidoc
- Compeye Simplex 1236C + Compeye Simplex 1236C
+ Memorex MaxxScan 6122

Bus type

@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@

Vendor ID

- 0x5cb + 0x05cb

Product ID

@@ -45,10 +46,14 @@

Comments

- All four scanners have the same ids. The vendor is PowerVision - Technologies. At lest the Avigram was sold as a scanner for + All scanners have the same ids. The vendor is PowerVision + Technologies. At least the Avigram was sold as a scanner for notebooks/mobile use.

+

+ Memorex explained that it's originally a Visioneer scanner (?). +

+

A user reports about using his Boeder scanner's parallel port:
2 years ago i used the parallel bus of my scanner, and it worked. What i did was @@ -102,6 +107,16 @@ C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=100mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms +E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=1ms + +Memorex MaxxScan 6122 +T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 +D: Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 +P: Vendor=05cb ProdID=1483 Rev= 1.00 +C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=100mA +I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) +E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms +E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=1ms

diff --git a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html index 5c421bbe..b70356d3 100644 --- a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html +++ b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch4800.html @@ -61,6 +61,98 @@ E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 8 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=250ms +<device descriptor of 0x04a7/0x0224 at 002:002> +bLength 18 +bDescriptorType 1 +bcdUSB 1.10 +bDeviceClass 0 +bDeviceSubClass 0 +bDeviceProtocol 0 +bMaxPacketSize0 8 +idVendor 0x04A7 +idProduct 0x0224 +bcdDevice 1.00 +iManufacturer 1 ((null)) +iProduct 2 ((null)) +iSerialNumber 8 ((null)) +bNumConfigurations 1 + <configuration 0> + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 2 + wTotalLength 39 + bNumInterfaces 1 + bConfigurationValue 1 + iConfiguration 6 ((null)) + bmAttributes 224 (Self-poweredRemote Wakeup) + MaxPower 0 mA + <interface 0> + <altsetting 0> + bLength 9 + bDescriptorType 4 + bInterfaceNumber 0 + bAlternateSetting 0 + bNumEndpoints 3 + bInterfaceClass 0 + bInterfaceSubClass 0 + bInterfaceProtocol 0 + iInterface 7 ((null)) + <endpoint 0> + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 64 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + <endpoint 1> + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) + bmAttributes 2 (bulk) + wMaxPacketSize 8 + bInterval 0 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + <endpoint 2> + bLength 7 + bDescriptorType 5 + bEndpointAddress 0x83 (in 0x03) + bmAttributes 3 (interrupt) + wMaxPacketSize 1 + bInterval 250 ms + bRefresh 0 + bSynchAddress 0 + +<trying to find out which USB chip is used> + checking for GT-6801 ... + this is not a GT-6801 (bDeviceClass = 0) + checking for GT-6816 ... + this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GT-8911 ... + this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for MA-1017 ... + this is not a MA-1017 (bcdUSB = 0x110) + checking for MA-1015 ... + this is not a MA-1015 (bDeviceClass = 0) + checking for MA-1509 ... + this is not a MA-1509 (bDeviceClass = 0) + checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... + this is not a LM983x (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL646 ... + this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL646_HP ... + this is not a GL646_HP (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL660+GL646 ... + this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for GL841 ... + this is not a GL841 (bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) + checking for ICM532B ... + this is not a ICM532B (check 1, bDeviceClass = 0, bInterfaceClass = 0) +<Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip> + +found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a7, product=0x0224) at libusb:002:002 + Vantas 3000: T: Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 10 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 diff --git a/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch6600.html b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch6600.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3187e3ee --- /dev/null +++ b/unsupported/visioneer-onetouch6600.html @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + + + Scanner information + + + + + + + + + +

Scanners not supported by SANE

+

Manufacturer and model

+

+ Visioneer Onetouch 6600 +

+

Bus type

+

+ USB +

+

Vendor ID

+

+ 0x04a7 +

+

Product ID

+

+ 0x022a +

+

Chipset

+

+ GL646?
+ Number printed on chip: 610800009609 +

+

Comments

+

+

+

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v or lsusb -vv

+
+
+    
+ +

Want to add or correct information?

+

+ If anything is wrong or missing on this page please file a bug report + or use the the + form for adding an unsupported device. +

+

+ If you own an unsupported scanner, please send as much information as + possible. Especially the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v + and/or cat /proc/scsi/scsi (for SCSI scanners) or cat + /proc/bus/usb/devices (for USB scanners) can help. If you dare to + open the scanner, have a look at the text that's printed on the + chips. That may help to identify the chipset. If you know that the + scanner is similar to another one (e.g. supported by the same Windows + driver), please also mention this fact. +

+ +

Information for Manufacturers

+

+ Are you a manufacturer or vendor of scanners and one of your scanners is + not supported by SANE yet? In this case please have a look at our information for manufacturers. +

+ +

Links

+ + +
+ +

+ SANE homepage
+ Contact +

+

+ $Date$ $Author$ +

+ + + diff --git a/unsupported/xerox-2400-onetouch.html b/unsupported/xerox-2400-onetouch.html index 67afc745..aeaceb13 100644 --- a/unsupported/xerox-2400-onetouch.html +++ b/unsupported/xerox-2400-onetouch.html @@ -31,13 +31,15 @@

Chipset

+ GL646_HP

Comments

+ As the chip is GL646_HP it may be supported by the genesys backend later.

Output of /proc/bus/usb/devices or sane-find-scanner -v -v

-<device descriptor of 0x0461/0x038b at 001:003 (Primax USB Scanner)>
+<device descriptor of 0x0461/0x038b at 003:002 (Primax USB Scanner)>
 bLength               18
 bDescriptorType       1
 bcdUSB                1.10
@@ -99,6 +101,29 @@ bNumConfigurations    1
     bInterval         8 ms
     bRefresh          0
     bSynchAddress     0
+
+<trying to find out which USB chip is used>
+    checking for GT-6801 ...
+    this is not a GT-6801 (bNumEndpoints = 3)
+    checking for GT-6816 ...
+    this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GT-8911 ...
+    this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1017 ...
+    this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for MA-1015 ...
+    this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x110)
+    checking for MA-1509 ...
+    this is not a MA-1509 (bEndpointAddress = 0x2, bmAttributes = 0x2, wMaxPacketSize = 0x40)
+    checking for LM983[1,2,3] ...
+    this is not a LM983x (bDeviceSubClass = 0xff)
+    checking for GL646 ...
+    this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
+    checking for GL646_HP ...
+<This USB chip looks like a GL646_HP>
+
+found USB scanner (vendor=0x0461 [Primax], product=0x038b [USB Scanner], chip=GL646_HP) at libusb:003:002
+
     

Want to add or correct information?