kopia lustrzana https://gitlab.com/sane-project/website
71 wiersze
3.2 KiB
HTML
71 wiersze
3.2 KiB
HTML
|
<!-- received="Sun Aug 15 15:50:57 1999 PDT" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- sent="Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:50:54 +0100 (GMT)" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- name="Nick Lamb" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- email="njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- subject="Re: SANE V2" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- id="" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- inreplyto="37B72F91.19FFEFBF@martoneconsulting.com" -->
|
|||
|
|
<title>sane-devel: Re: SANE V2</title>
|
|||
|
|
<h1>Re: SANE V2</h1>
|
|||
|
|
<b>Nick Lamb</b> (<a href="mailto:njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk"><i>njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk</i></a>)<br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:50:54 +0100 (GMT)</i>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<ul>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#182">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#182">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#182">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#182">[ author ]</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0183.html">Tom Martone: "Re: SANE V2"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0181.html">Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
</ul>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- body="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Tom Martone wrote:<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> I'd have to disagree with you on this on, Nick. If you have a scanner</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> that has an integral barcode/patchcode decoding feature that works on the</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> surrently scanned image data in the firmware of the scanner, do we want to</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> use SANE just to get the image data? Then do we get an OCR package to</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> decode in software, the barcodes out of the saved image data? I've</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> observed that the scanner firmware does it more quickly and more reliably, </i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> than an OCR approach and it does it at scan time rather than a separate</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> pass.</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Well, you make a very convincing argument, and you do have this hardware<br>
|
|||
|
|
sat in front of you, which I don't. I asked this before, but I can't<br>
|
|||
|
|
remember what exactly you said in response:<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Does it make sense to you (considering the TWAIN way of doing it among<br>
|
|||
|
|
other things) for us to provide the results of a stuff like barcode<br>
|
|||
|
|
scans in a SANE Option (just like you can specify the R/G/B exposures<br>
|
|||
|
|
used by an auto-calibrating slide scanner) OR more like the existing<br>
|
|||
|
|
image transfer frames, only with text in?<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Initially I thought that using SANE Options was a nicer way, because you<br>
|
|||
|
|
can have something like this (I might be bending SANE's rules here a<br>
|
|||
|
|
little bit, but I think it works today, in theory)<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
SANE Option "Barcodes", hardware feature, not user alterable, string<br>
|
|||
|
|
constraint { "9 780201 835953", "3 057640 136993", "MULTIM-44-2731" }<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
But if this stuff is just another output from a scan which might also<br>
|
|||
|
|
give us 5 JPEGs and a couple of G32D images, then I guess the text<br>
|
|||
|
|
frame makes a lot of sense. Formatting it would be your problem :)<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Nick.<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<pre>
|
|||
|
|
--
|
|||
|
|
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
|
|||
|
|
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
|
|||
|
|
</pre>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- body="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<ul>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0183.html">Tom Martone: "Re: SANE V2"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0181.html">Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
</ul>
|