kopia lustrzana https://gitlab.com/sane-project/website
71 wiersze
2.9 KiB
HTML
71 wiersze
2.9 KiB
HTML
|
<!-- received="Tue Apr 20 12:44:34 1999 PDT" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- sent="Tue, 20 Apr 1999 20:42:51 +0100 (BST)" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- name="Nick Lamb" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- email="njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- subject="Re: Silly question?" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- id="" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- inreplyto="371CD2F1.C0EDEBD7@easysw.com" -->
|
|||
|
|
<title>sane-devel: Re: Silly question?</title>
|
|||
|
|
<h1>Re: Silly question?</h1>
|
|||
|
|
<b>Nick Lamb</b> (<a href="mailto:njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk"><i>njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk</i></a>)<br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 20:42:51 +0100 (BST)</i>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<ul>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#275">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#275">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#275">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#275">[ author ]</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0276.html">Ingo Wilken: "Mirrors (Re: latest beta finally available!)"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0274.html">Michael Sweet: "Re: Silly question?"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
</ul>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- body="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Michael Sweet wrote:<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> I added support for the "scsi ..." format to 1.0 (it wasn't in 1.0,</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<i>> but in the patches I posted and the pre1.01 release).</i><br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
So, answering your own question. Yes, there's a known bug in SANE 1.00<br>
|
|||
|
|
where the HP backend doesn't work with "scsi HP" in the config file.<br>
|
|||
|
|
It seems like ancient history to those of us who've been subscribed to<br>
|
|||
|
|
this list for a while, but every new user with a HP scanner goes <br>
|
|||
|
|
through the following process<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
(1) Download SANE 1.00 (it's the stable, tested release, right?)<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
(2) Try to use it<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
(3) Doesn't work, complain to sane-devel mailing list<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
(4) Get told to remove "scsi HP" from the config file<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
(5) Now it works, happiness results<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
It doesn't matter that the bug was FIXED a week after 1.00, or an hour<br>
|
|||
|
|
or a second after. Users will run 1.00 because that's the stable version<br>
|
|||
|
|
from the site, even if you tell them it's a bug ridden pile of rubbish<br>
|
|||
|
|
(which it isn't) they'll still run 1.00 rather than 1.01pre-alpha-b0.1<br>
|
|||
|
|
because it *looks* like the stable version.<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Even when 1.01 goes out the door (months late IMHO) there'll still be<br>
|
|||
|
|
6--12 months of the same old story, because users got 1.00 in their<br>
|
|||
|
|
copy of Red Hat, Caldera or whatever, and haven't updated. It's the<br>
|
|||
|
|
price you pay for the "Brown Paper Bag" mistake in v1.00<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
Nick.<br>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<pre>
|
|||
|
|
--
|
|||
|
|
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
|
|||
|
|
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
|
|||
|
|
</pre>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- body="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
<p>
|
|||
|
|
<ul>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0276.html">Ingo Wilken: "Mirrors (Re: latest beta finally available!)"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0274.html">Michael Sweet: "Re: Silly question?"</a>
|
|||
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|||
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|||
|
|
</ul>
|