sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-11/0288.html

92 wiersze
3.7 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Sun Nov 29 14:41:55 1998 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:20:09 +0100 (CET)" -->
<!-- name="Christian Ordig" -->
<!-- email="chr.ordig@gmx.net" -->
<!-- subject="RE: Primax scanner" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="36613A11.2DBCE7C8@helvetet.net" -->
<title>sane-devel: RE: Primax scanner</title>
<h1>RE: Primax scanner</h1>
<b>Christian Ordig</b> (<a href="mailto:chr.ordig@gmx.net"><i>chr.ordig@gmx.net</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:20:09 +0100 (CET)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#288">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#288">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#288">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#288">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0289.html">Christopher J. Tearpak: "Re: SANE 1.00 breaks on Solaris v2.6"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0287.html">Hugo van der Kooij: "SANE 1.0 on Solaris v2.6 II"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Hi Sabbacus,<br>
<p>
we've just started the project and are still searching for enough people<br>
supporting us. We've written several letters to Primax without any success.<br>
We're trying to sniff the data sent thru the parallel cable when scanning...<br>
perhaps it'll be possible to learn sth. about the used protocol... Nevertheless<br>
we're going to ask Primax for a NDA on Monday...<br>
I've made a list with project members and I've 3 categories: Users, Developers<br>
and Beta-Testers. What would be the right description for you?<br>
Perhaps I'm going to start a message-board on our www-site... What do you think<br>
about this?<br>
<p>
Thank you for supporting us.<br>
<p>
The Primax Scanner Driver Project for Linux/UN*X<br>
&lt;<a href="http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/Primax/">http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/Primax/</a>&gt;<br>
<p>
<p>
On 29-Nov-98 Sabbacus S:t Rubens wrote:<br>
<i>&gt; Hi there, i was just wondering, i have a Primax colorado direct 30 bit</i><br>
<i>&gt; flatbed scanner (parallell port), is there any developmeng going on 4</i><br>
<i>&gt; that 1 ??</i><br>
That's the same model, that I use.<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; //Sabbacus</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; --</i><br>
<i>&gt; Literarum radices amaras, fructus dulces</i><br>
<i>&gt; (Kunskapens rot <20>r bitter, men dess frukter <20>r s<>ta)</i><br>
<i>&gt; av Cicero, d<>d <20>r 43 f kr</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Sabbacus S:t Rubens</i><br>
<i>&gt; <a href="mailto:sabbacus@helvetet.net">mailto:sabbacus@helvetet.net</a></i><br>
<i>&gt; ICQ: 6520797</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; --</i><br>
<i>&gt; Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a></i><br>
<i>&gt; To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a></i><br>
<p>
<pre>
---
Christian Ordig
Germany
<p>
__ _
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to waiting
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0289.html">Christopher J. Tearpak: "Re: SANE 1.00 breaks on Solaris v2.6"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0287.html">Hugo van der Kooij: "SANE 1.0 on Solaris v2.6 II"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>