2003-09-23 07:09:19 +00:00
|
|
|
Plustek-Driver TROUBLESHOOTING/FAQ - 19.04.2001
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The driver exists now since March 2000, this is the first trial to setup
|
|
|
|
a FAQ. This leads into the following:
|
|
|
|
First we have a part, which is more a troubleshooting section and the second
|
|
|
|
one is the FAQ.
|
|
|
|
To search through this text, search for "SYMPTOM" or "Q:".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have some more FAQ entries, let me know <gerhard@gjaeger.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THANKS to Jochen <jochen@puchalla-online.de>, who roamed through the
|
|
|
|
mailing-list and gathered the different questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
* TROUBLE-SHOOTING *
|
|
|
|
* *
|
|
|
|
* DRIVER TOPICS *
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: "kernel-module version mismatch"
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
"When I try to "make load" I get an error"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/sbin/modprobe pt_drv || exit 1
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-6.0.6/misc/pt_drv.o: kernel-module version mismatch
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-6.0.1/misc/pt_drv.o was compiled
|
|
|
|
for kernel version 2.2.14-5.0
|
|
|
|
while this kernel is version 2.2.14-6.0.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
You're using the wrong Kernel-header files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The path
|
|
|
|
/usr/include/linux is a link to
|
|
|
|
/usr/src/linux/include/linux and
|
|
|
|
/usr/src/linux is normally a link to your current
|
|
|
|
kernel, i.e:
|
|
|
|
/usr/src/linux-2.2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you now upgrade your kernel and you have
|
|
|
|
forgotten to correct the link /usr/src/linux, then
|
|
|
|
every kernel-module you build outside the
|
|
|
|
kernelsource structure will include the wrong
|
|
|
|
version information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
Set the link /usr/src/linux
|
|
|
|
to your current kernel-source tree before recompiling
|
|
|
|
kernel-modules like pt_drv, then your version mismatch
|
|
|
|
problem should be solved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: "Device or resource busy"
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
Any attempt to "modprobe" or "make load" the driver leads
|
|
|
|
to this message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The driver refuses to load. During startup, the driver performs
|
|
|
|
some tests according to the parallel port and the connected
|
|
|
|
scanners.
|
|
|
|
If the parallel port is not supported or the scanner cannot be
|
|
|
|
found, the driver returns an error and the system will report
|
|
|
|
"device or resource busy"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
There's no way to provide a general solution. First of all
|
|
|
|
you should check your connections and the parallel port.
|
|
|
|
Also check power for your scanner.
|
|
|
|
If the problem still exists, enable the debug-messages of the
|
|
|
|
pt_drv module (see INSTALL).
|
|
|
|
Then check the messages after loading or send the output to
|
|
|
|
the mailing list.
|
|
|
|
Most of these problems are related to HW-problems. Before
|
|
|
|
giving up, check the scanner under Windows (not really a
|
|
|
|
good advice I know, but it helps to find HW-damage).
|
|
|
|
There was also one case were the internal plugs of the parport
|
|
|
|
connection were wrong...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: "Unresolved symbols"
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
"make load" or "modprobe pt_drv" produces this message:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/sbin/modprobe pt_drv || exit 1
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol parport_unregister_device
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol parport_enumerate
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol parport_register_device
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol parport_claim
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol parport_release
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod
|
|
|
|
/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o failed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The driver needs at least the parport_pc and the parport modules
|
|
|
|
to work. They MUST be loaded prior to pt_drv. If these modules
|
|
|
|
are not loaded you get this message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
Simply load the parport module. You can add this dependency to
|
|
|
|
your /etc/modules.conf (or /etc/conf.modules) file (see INSTALL).
|
|
|
|
Then everytime you load pt_drv with modprobe, parport will be loaded
|
|
|
|
automatically. After modifying this file, call
|
|
|
|
depmod -va
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: Scanner makes awful noise
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
This can have two major causes:
|
|
|
|
- You have an ASIC96001/3 based scanner, then the sensor hits the
|
|
|
|
scanbed: !!! TURN OFF SCANNER POWER !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- You have an ASIC98001 based scanner, then the motor control does
|
|
|
|
not work correctly --> hit the cancel button
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
For the first case (ASIC 96001/3), there's no solution available. This
|
|
|
|
happens, when the driver can't keep track of the stepper motor. The image
|
|
|
|
you get is normally unusable.
|
|
|
|
The second case is often reported when the printer driver lp.o is
|
|
|
|
already loaded. So remove lp.o before loading pt_drv.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: Printer starts to print while scanning
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
It has been reported, that some printers (esp. HP printers) start to
|
|
|
|
print, even during startup of the driver. This is a problem to printers
|
|
|
|
which use a bidirectional protocol for talking with the system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
There is no possibility to handle this problem inside the driver.
|
|
|
|
One possibility is to switch off the bidirectional communication of the
|
|
|
|
printer. The other one is to connect the printer to another parallel port.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
* SANE-topics *
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here you will not find how to setup xscanimage to work with GIMP or
|
|
|
|
how to compile sane to obtain xscanimage, for such questions, please
|
2003-09-24 20:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
refer to the mailing lists at SANE (http://www.sane-project.org)
|
2003-09-23 07:09:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: error in loading shared libraries: libsane.so.1: cannot open
|
|
|
|
-------- shared object file: No such file or directory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The shared libraries for SANE have been installed to a
|
|
|
|
directory which is not in your "library path"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
SANE installs its shared libraries to PREFIX/lib/sane.
|
|
|
|
PREFIX is in general /usr or /usr/local. You should
|
|
|
|
either add the path to your /etc/ld.so.conf file or
|
|
|
|
set links to the libraries from a wellknown lib-path.
|
|
|
|
(i.e. ln -s /usr/lib/sane/libsane.so.1 /usr/lib/libsane.so.1)
|
|
|
|
In any case you should run "ldconfig -v"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMPTOM: "no SANE devices found"
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
While testing with "scanimage -L" nothing happens. And when starting scanimage
|
|
|
|
this message is displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
The frontend cannot find any sane-device, this might have several causes:
|
|
|
|
- the driver is not loaded
|
|
|
|
- you have no access to the driver
|
|
|
|
- the backend is not enabled
|
|
|
|
- the driver is not specified
|
|
|
|
- version conflict between the loaded driver and the backend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
Driver not loaded: check "cat /proc/pt_drv" if this does not exist, load
|
|
|
|
the driver (see INSTALL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No access to the driver: check "ls -l /dev/pt_drv*" and you should get
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 40, 0 Aug 29 15:18 /dev/pt_drv
|
|
|
|
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 40, 0 Aug 29 15:18 /dev/pt_drv0
|
|
|
|
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 40, 1 Aug 29 15:18 /dev/pt_drv1
|
|
|
|
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 40, 2 Aug 29 15:18 /dev/pt_drv2
|
|
|
|
crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 40, 3 Aug 29 15:18 /dev/pt_drv3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If not, call "make load" in the driver source directory. This call sometimes
|
|
|
|
fails, so you might create the entries by using mknod:
|
|
|
|
mknod -m 0664 /dev/pt_drv c 40 0
|
|
|
|
mknod -m 0664 /dev/pt_drv0 c 40 0
|
|
|
|
mknod -m 0664 /dev/pt_drv1 c 40 1
|
|
|
|
mknod -m 0664 /dev/pt_drv2 c 40 2
|
|
|
|
mknod -m 0664 /dev/pt_drv3 c 40 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The backend is not enabled: Check the SANE configuration in /etc/sane.d,
|
|
|
|
/usr/etc/sane.d or /usr/local/etc/sane.d (depending on your installation).
|
|
|
|
Your dll.conf MUST include an enabled "plustek" entry (no "#" in front of
|
|
|
|
that line)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The driver is not specified: Check the sane configuration (see above)
|
|
|
|
for the file plustek.conf and make sure that it contains at least
|
|
|
|
/dev/pt_drv as entry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version conflict: After enabling the SANE debug messages you will
|
|
|
|
get something like upon starting scanimage:
|
|
|
|
ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9019)
|
|
|
|
Version problem, please recompile driver!
|
|
|
|
In this case, you MUST recompile the backend AND the driver and reinstall
|
|
|
|
both. This feature makes sure, that both always will use the same ioctl
|
|
|
|
interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEM:
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
I have SANE-1.0.4 and there's no backend-directory after unpacking, so
|
|
|
|
what to do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
You're wrong there is a backend directory!!!
|
|
|
|
Since SANE-1.0.4, there are two packages:
|
|
|
|
sane-backends
|
|
|
|
sane-frontends
|
|
|
|
For the installation, you need the backend tarball. This should give
|
|
|
|
you something like:
|
|
|
|
sane-1.0.4/sane-backends
|
|
|
|
and there below sane-backends is the backend directory. So you have
|
|
|
|
to unpack the plustek-sane...tgz in sane-backends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
* F A Q *
|
|
|
|
*******************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What does "Turbo" mean ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: Turbo does not mean, that the scanner is faster ;-)
|
|
|
|
There are currently three OpticPro9636P Scanners.
|
|
|
|
OP9636P
|
|
|
|
OP9636P+
|
|
|
|
OP9636PTurbo
|
|
|
|
The + and the Turbo models are quite the same and the difference between
|
|
|
|
the Turbo and the non-Turbo is the scan-sensor. The Turbo uses the same
|
|
|
|
like the newer OP9636T/12000T and the non-Turbo uses the older ones
|
|
|
|
from the OP9630....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Is it possible to use the front-button of my Plustek 9630P ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: It is possible since version 0.37. After loading the driver,
|
|
|
|
use the proc filesystem to get the button value:
|
|
|
|
cat /proc/pt_drv/device0/button0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Is it possible to use the scanner in gimp ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: You should be able to use xscanimage with gimp:
|
|
|
|
1. Login as root
|
|
|
|
2. Go into the gimp plug-in directory
|
|
|
|
(on SuSE it is: /usr/lib/gimp/1.1/plug-ins/ )
|
|
|
|
3. Find xscanimage : which xscanimage
|
|
|
|
4. Create a symbolic link to xscanimage :
|
|
|
|
ln -s "/path/to/"xscanimage xscanimage
|
|
|
|
5. logout as root
|
|
|
|
Now call gimp, in the xtns menu you should find
|
|
|
|
now the Acquire Image menu entry. That's all.
|
|
|
|
If not, start gimp from an xterm and have a look at the output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Is there any way to load the plustek_driver at bootup-time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: Normally, there is no need to do so, because once you
|
|
|
|
altered your /etc/conf.modules file (or /etc/modules.conf)
|
|
|
|
and added the suggested stuff (see INSTALL file), you won't
|
|
|
|
have to worry about loading the driver. It happens automagically. ;-)
|
|
|
|
The driver will be loaded when needed (and eventually
|
|
|
|
removed after a specific time of not using it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless, another possibility is to do a modprobe pt_drv in the
|
|
|
|
/etc/rc.d/boot.local (using SuSE) or
|
|
|
|
/etc/rc.d/rc.local (using RedHat or Mandrake) file
|
|
|
|
So the driver will be loaded at bootup-time...
|
|
|
|
!!! YOUR SCANNER MUST BE ONLINE during power-up then !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: I wonder if Mandrake 7.1's sane rpm file has this support already built in.
|
|
|
|
My scanner light is coming on yet Xscanimage seems to report that there
|
|
|
|
is no scanner present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: The backend code will be included in Version 1.0.3 of sane and
|
|
|
|
AFAIK Mandrake 7.1 only includes 1.0.2.
|
|
|
|
Anyway go to the plustek-driver download page at
|
|
|
|
http://home.t-online.de/home/g-jaeger/plustek.html
|
|
|
|
download and install the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Mandrake installs sane by default at install-time.
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to install the driver with the preinstalled sane
|
|
|
|
or should the preinstalled sane be removed first?
|
|
|
|
If so, how do I remove the preinstalled sane?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: I recommend to uninstall the previous one.
|
|
|
|
I think Mandrake uses RPM for managing the packages. To remove sane
|
|
|
|
do the following (as root)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask for all installed packages and filter sane:
|
|
|
|
rpm -qa | grep sane
|
|
|
|
you should get something like this:
|
|
|
|
sane-1.0.1-94
|
|
|
|
Now remove this package:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpm -e sane-1.0.1-94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After theses steps, sane should be removed.
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure, but you might have to remove the /etc/sane.d manually...
|
|
|
|
Now got to your sane-1.0.3 stuff and reinstall this
|
|
|
|
as described. Before using, you might have a look
|
|
|
|
at the dll.conf and enable only the plustek backend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Now that there's a sane 1.0.3, how do i uninstall sane 1.0.2?
|
|
|
|
Or can i install it over?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: In general you can install it over. BUT this has caused
|
|
|
|
quite a lot of trouble, so I recommend to remove the 1.0.2
|
|
|
|
completely and install 1.0.3...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try the rpm-tool:
|
|
|
|
Get a list of the installed packages and filter out sane:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpm -qa | grep sane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should get something like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sane-1.0.2-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then use rpm to remove sane:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpm -e sane-1.0.2-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The other way is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /etc/sane.d
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/lib/sane
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/lib/libsane*
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/include/sane
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/etc/sane.d
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/share/sane*
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/local/lib/sane
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/local/lib/libsane*
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/local/include/sane
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/local/etc/sane.d
|
|
|
|
rm -rf /usr/local/share/sane*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should cover all the directories where maybe some
|
|
|
|
sane files are installed...
|
|
|
|
|