Expand comments and doc strings

pull/242/head
Tim Head 2018-10-16 09:17:24 +02:00
rodzic 98d46957f1
commit 05bdc12651
1 zmienionych plików z 15 dodań i 9 usunięć

Wyświetl plik

@ -192,11 +192,14 @@ class Repo2Docker(Application):
)
def fetch(self, url, ref, checkout_path):
"""Check out a repo using url and ref to the checkout_path location"""
# Pick a content provider based on URL
"""Check out a repo using url and ref to the checkout_path locationself.
Iterate through possible content providers until a valid provider,
based on URL, is found.
"""
picked_content_provider = None
for CP in self.content_providers:
cp = CP()
for ContentProvider in self.content_providers:
cp = ContentProvider()
spec = cp.detect(url, ref=ref)
if spec is not None:
picked_content_provider = cp
@ -433,7 +436,9 @@ class Repo2Docker(Application):
# editing
if args.editable:
# the user has to point at a directory, not just a path for us
# to be able to mount it
# to be able to mount it. We might have content providers that can
# provide content from a local `something.zip` file, which we
# couldn't mount in editable mode
if os.path.isdir(args.repo):
self.volumes[os.path.abspath(args.repo)] = '.'
else:
@ -680,10 +685,11 @@ class Repo2Docker(Application):
raise e
sys.exit(1)
# if the source is a directory we will keep using it, assuming that
# is what the user wanted. This is how repo2docker has been working so
# far. Reusing a local directory seems better than making a copy of it
# as it might contain large files that would be expensive to copy.
# If the source to be executed is a directory, continue using the
# directory. In the case of a local directory, it is used as both the
# source and target. Reusing a local directory seems better than
# making a copy of it as it might contain large files that would be
# expensive to copy.
if os.path.isdir(self.repo):
checkout_path = self.repo
else: