Fixed grammatical and sentence structure issues. (#112)

README.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 
 The simplest open protocol that is able to create a censorship-resistant global "social" network once and for all.
 
-It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; it does not rely on P2P techniques, therefore it works.
+It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; it does not rely on P2P techniques, and therefore it works.
 
-This is a work-in-progress. [Join the Telegram group!](https://t.me/nostr_protocol)
+This is a work in progress. [Join the Telegram group!](https://t.me/nostr_protocol)
 
 ## Very short summary of how it works, if you don't plan to read anything else:
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Everybody runs a client. It can be a native client, a web client, etc. To publis
 - Twitter uses bizarre techniques to keep you addicted;
 - Twitter doesn't show an actual historical feed from people you follow;
 - Twitter bans people;
-- Twitter shadowbans people.
+- Twitter shadowbans people;
 - Twitter has a lot of spam.
 
 ### The problem with Mastodon and similar programs
@@ -32,14 +32,14 @@ Everybody runs a client. It can be a native client, a web client, etc. To publis
 - User identities are attached to domain names controlled by third-parties;
 - Server owners can ban you, just like Twitter; Server owners can also block other servers;
 - Migration between servers is an afterthought and can only be accomplished if servers cooperate. It doesn't work in an adversarial environment (all followers are lost);
-- There are no clear incentives to run servers, therefore they tend to be run by enthusiasts and people who want to have their name attached to a cool domain. Then, users are subject to the despotism of a single person, which is often worse than that of a big company like Twitter, and they can't migrate out;
+- There are no clear incentives to run servers, therefore, they tend to be run by enthusiasts and people who want to have their name attached to a cool domain. Then, users are subject to the despotism of a single person, which is often worse than that of a big company like Twitter, and they can't migrate out;
 - Since servers tend to be run amateurishly, they are often abandoned after a while — which is effectively the same as banning everybody;
 - It doesn't make sense to have a ton of servers if updates from every server will have to be painfully pushed (and saved!) to a ton of other servers. This point is exacerbated by the fact that servers tend to exist in huge numbers, therefore more data has to be passed to more places more often;
 - For the specific example of video sharing, ActivityPub enthusiasts realized it would be completely impossible to transmit video from server to server the way text notes are, so they decided to keep the video hosted only from the single instance where it was posted to, which is similar to the Nostr approach.
 
 ### The problem with SSB (Secure Scuttlebutt)
 
-- It doesn't have many problems. I think it's great. In fact, I was going to use it as a basis for this, but
+- It doesn't have many problems. I think it's great. I was going to use it as a basis for this, but
 - its protocol is too complicated because it wasn't thought about being an open protocol at all. It was just written in JavaScript in probably a quick way to solve a specific problem and grew from that, therefore it has weird and unnecessary quirks like signing a JSON string which must strictly follow the rules of [_ECMA-262 6th Edition_](https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-json.stringify);
 - It insists on having a chain of updates from a single user, which feels unnecessary to me and something that adds bloat and rigidity to the thing — each server/user needs to store all the chain of posts to be sure the new one is valid. Why? (Maybe they have a good reason);
 - It is not as simple as Nostr, as it was primarily made for P2P syncing, with "pubs" being an afterthought;