diff --git a/MicroPythonVsELua.md b/MicroPythonVsELua.md
index 8d5fae1..a5c0d36 100644
--- a/MicroPythonVsELua.md
+++ b/MicroPythonVsELua.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 1. Latest release of Lua is 5.2. eLua is based on Lua 5.1.4, and this fact is not widely publicized. (ref: https://github.com/elua/elua/blob/master/src/lua/lua.h) uPy is based on the latest Python release, 3.4 (Note: over time, uPy will certainly linger with updates, too).
 
-2. eLua, with LTR patch, boasts only 5.42K RAM usage after book, down from ~25K with unpatched Lua. (ref: http://www.eluaproject.net/doc/v0.9/en_arch_ltr.html). uPy offers ~540 *bytes* usage after boot (10 times less than patched eLua), and truly can boot and accept commands with 2K heap.
+2. eLua, with LTR patch, boasts only 5.42K RAM usage after boot, down from ~25K with unpatched Lua. (ref: http://www.eluaproject.net/doc/v0.9/en_arch_ltr.html). uPy offers ~540 *bytes* usage after boot (10 times less than patched eLua), and truly can boot and accept commands with 2K heap.
 
 3. Just a quote (http://www.eluaproject.net/doc/v0.9/en_elua_egc.html):
 > The EGC (Emergency Garbage Collector) patch [...], what it does is that it lets you run a garbage collection cycle in Lua in a low memory situation, from inside Lua's memory allocation function (something that the current version of Lua can't do out of the box).