Add portainer blurb to FAQ

pull/249/head
pagdot 2024-09-27 09:47:40 +02:00 zatwierdzone przez GitHub
rodzic 8aa3691969
commit 1f6276d8e5
Nie znaleziono w bazie danych klucza dla tego podpisu
ID klucza GPG: B5690EEEBB952194
1 zmienionych plików z 10 dodań i 0 usunięć

Wyświetl plik

@ -217,3 +217,13 @@ Then on our `foo` service we tell it to use this rule, as well as telling Traefi
- traefik.http.services.foo.loadbalancer.serverstransport=ignorecert
- traefik.http.services.foo.loadbalancer.server.scheme=https
```
## Why does the LinuxServer.io-recommends to use docker-compose over portainer? {#portainer}
Portainer has many issues which make it hard for us to support, such as:
- Advanced settings are hidden and some aren't available at all
- Incorrect order of source and target of mounts
- Inconsistent case-sensitivity
- No automatically created custom networks for inter-container communication
- Inconsistent compose implementations on different architectures
- Incorrectly applying environment variables on container upgrades